Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION 2026-04-26 19:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
CCN 141305 | IL | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $-555K → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$43.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-555K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$711K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$864K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$855K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$526K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$864K$864K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$831K$24K$855K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$133K$393K$526K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$216K$432K$648K$864K$864K$864K$864K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$214K$428K$641K$855K$855K$855K$855K
A/R Days Reduction$0$175K$350K$526K$526K$526K$526K$526K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$619K$1.2M$1.8M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.2x
Headroom (turns)
142%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 142% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.7x, adding 101.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-555K$-555K-1.3%
Year 1$-572K+$1.5M$943K2.2%
Year 2$-589K+$2.3M$1.7M3.9%
Year 3$-607K+$2.3M$1.7M3.9%
Year 4$-625K+$2.3M$1.6M3.8%
Year 5$-644K+$2.3M$1.6M3.8%
$-5.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$17.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.5M
Value Created
$1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-885K
Organic Growth
$22.7M
RCM Value Creation
$1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$432K$648K$864K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$428K$641K$855K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$263K$394K$526K$631K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.3%-6.1%-0.8%7.3%
P45
Net-to-Gross44.6%35.8%44.1%49.2%
P52
Occupancy43.1%17.2%23.9%36.9%
P80
Rev/Bed$2.4M$1.1M$1.6M$2.3M
P81
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML