Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GENESIS MEDICAL CENTER - ALEDO 2026-04-26 19:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GENESIS MEDICAL CENTER - ALEDO
CCN 141304 | IL | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $-354K → Pro Forma $642K (+$996K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-354K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$996K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$642K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$726K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$996K
Modeled Uplift
$586K
Risk-Adjusted
-$410K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$379K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$375K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$230K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$996K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$379K$379K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$364K$10K$375K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$58K$172K$230K$726K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$95K$189K$284K$379K$379K$379K$379K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$94K$187K$281K$375K$375K$375K$375K
A/R Days Reduction$0$77K$154K$230K$230K$230K$230K$230K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$271K$542K$807K$996K$996K$996K$996K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $996K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
11.2x
Headroom (turns)
172%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 172% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -4.7x, adding 103.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-354K$-354K-1.9%
Year 1$-365K+$664K$299K1.6%
Year 2$-375K+$996K$620K3.3%
Year 3$-387K+$996K$609K3.2%
Year 4$-398K+$996K$597K3.2%
Year 5$-410K+$996K$585K3.1%
$-3.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$6.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.0M
Value Created
$585K
Exit EBITDA
$-564K
Organic Growth
$10.0M
RCM Value Creation
$585K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$189K$284K$379K$454K
Denial Rate Reductio$187K$281K$375K$450K
A/R Days Reduction$115K$173K$230K$276K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$15K
Total$498K$747K$996K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 68 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.9%-6.7%-1.2%7.3%
P45
Net-to-Gross52.2%35.1%43.7%49.2%
P79
Occupancy12.3%17.4%26.1%42.3%
P6
Rev/Bed$860K$1.1M$1.5M$2.2M
P17
Exp/Bed$876K$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P13

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML