Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WARNER HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES 2026-04-26 19:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WARNER HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
CCN 141303 | IL | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $501K → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$501K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$858K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$686K
Risk-Adjusted
-$491K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$448K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$443K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$272K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$448K$448K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$431K$12K$443K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$69K$204K$272K$858K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$112K$224K$336K$448K$448K$448K$448K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$111K$222K$332K$443K$443K$443K$443K
A/R Days Reduction$0$91K$182K$272K$272K$272K$272K$272K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$321K$641K$955K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x86% / 22.4x91% / 25.2x95% / 28.1x97% / 29.5x99% / 30.9x
9.0x81% / 19.6x86% / 22.1x90% / 24.6x92% / 25.9x94% / 27.1x
10.0x77% / 17.3x81% / 19.6x85% / 21.8x87% / 23.0x89% / 24.1x
11.0x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.5x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.6x
12.0x69% / 13.8x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.6x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.0x
Headroom (turns)
61%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 61% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.5x, adding 5.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$501K$501K2.2%
Year 1$516K+$785K$1.3M5.8%
Year 2$532K+$1.2M$1.7M7.6%
Year 3$548K+$1.2M$1.7M7.7%
Year 4$564K+$1.2M$1.7M7.8%
Year 5$581K+$1.2M$1.8M7.9%
$5.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$19.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.3M
Value Created
$1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$799K
Organic Growth
$11.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$224K$336K$448K$537K
Denial Rate Reductio$222K$332K$443K$532K
A/R Days Reduction$136K$204K$272K$327K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$589K$883K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 57 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.2%-6.1%-0.8%9.5%
P60
Net-to-Gross61.4%36.9%44.3%50.1%
P93
Occupancy3.8%17.0%23.8%34.4%
P0
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M
P44
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML