Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EAST 2026-04-26 18:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EAST
CCN 140307 | IL | 94 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.2M → Pro Forma $-2.4M (+$4.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$92.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.8M
Modeled Uplift
$3.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.2M (vs $4.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$59K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$51K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$283K$839K$1.1M$3.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$59K$59K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$461K$922K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$456K$912K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$374K$748K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$29K$59K$59K$59K$59K$59K$59K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.2M$-7.2M-7.8%
Year 1$-7.4M+$3.2M$-4.2M-4.6%
Year 2$-7.7M+$4.8M$-2.8M-3.0%
Year 3$-7.9M+$4.8M$-3.0M-3.3%
Year 4$-8.1M+$4.8M$-3.3M-3.5%
Year 5$-8.4M+$4.8M$-3.5M-3.8%
$-72.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-38.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.5M
Value Created
$-3.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-11.5M
Organic Growth
$48.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$922K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$912K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$561K$841K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$29K$44K$59K$71K
Total$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 79 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.8%-23.3%-8.5%4.7%
P53
Net-to-Gross21.2%22.2%26.8%38.0%
P21
Occupancy48.7%34.8%51.3%68.9%
P47
Rev/Bed$980K$552K$947K$1.5M
P53
Exp/Bed$1.1M$518K$1.1M$1.6M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML