Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KISHWAUKEE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KISHWAUKEE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 140286 | IL | 98 beds | Current EBITDA $90.5M → Pro Forma $109.2M (+$18.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$355.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$90.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$109.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$18.7M
Modeled Uplift
$14.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.0M (vs $18.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$227K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.1M$7.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.8M$195K$7.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$227K$227K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$114K$227K$227K$227K$227K$227K$227K
Cumulative$0$5.1M$10.2M$15.2M$18.7M$18.7M$18.7M$18.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$90.5M$90.5M25.5%
Year 1$93.2M+$12.5M$105.6M29.7%
Year 2$96.0M+$18.7M$114.7M32.3%
Year 3$98.9M+$18.7M$117.5M33.1%
Year 4$101.8M+$18.7M$120.5M33.9%
Year 5$104.9M+$18.7M$123.6M34.8%
$904.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.36B
Exit EV (11x)
$454.6M
Value Created
$123.6M
Exit EBITDA
$144.1M
Organic Growth
$186.9M
RCM Value Creation
$123.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$8.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$114K$171K$227K$273K
Total$9.3M$14.0M$18.7M$22.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 82 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.5%-21.8%-7.8%5.1%
P92
Net-to-Gross27.7%21.2%25.9%36.7%
P52
Occupancy71.1%35.0%51.9%69.7%
P78
Rev/Bed$3.6M$565K$938K$1.6M
P95
Exp/Bed$2.7M$532K$1.1M$1.7M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML