Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ALEXIAN BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ALEXIAN BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 140258 | IL | 282 beds | Current EBITDA $-22.2M → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$25.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$474.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-22.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$25.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$25.0M
Modeled Uplift
$17.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.6M (vs $25.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$304K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$25.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.5M$9.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.1M$261K$9.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.3M$5.8M$18.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$304K$304K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.7M$7.1M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.7M$7.0M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$152K$304K$304K$304K$304K$304K$304K
Cumulative$0$6.8M$13.6M$20.2M$25.0M$25.0M$25.0M$25.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $25.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-68.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
74.5x
Headroom (turns)
1146%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1146% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -68.0x, adding 167.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-22.2M$-22.2M-4.7%
Year 1$-22.9M+$16.6M$-6.2M-1.3%
Year 2$-23.6M+$25.0M$1.4M0.3%
Year 3$-24.3M+$25.0M$705K0.1%
Year 4$-25.0M+$25.0M$-23K-0.0%
Year 5$-25.7M+$25.0M$-772K-0.2%
$-222.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-8.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$213.5M
Value Created
$-772K
Exit EBITDA
$-35.4M
Organic Growth
$249.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-772K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.7M$7.1M$9.5M$11.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.7M$7.0M$9.4M$11.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
Clean Claim Rate$152K$228K$304K$364K
Total$12.5M$18.7M$25.0M$30.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 76 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.7%-16.5%-7.7%3.5%
P58
Net-to-Gross20.9%20.8%24.8%31.4%
P26
Occupancy69.8%51.4%65.0%72.5%
P62
Rev/Bed$1.7M$836K$1.3M$1.8M
P70
Exp/Bed$1.8M$909K$1.4M$1.8M
P72

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML