Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH SUBURBAN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 16:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH SUBURBAN HOSPITAL
CCN 140250 | IL | 233 beds | Current EBITDA $-27.7M → Pro Forma $-17.6M (+$10.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$191.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-27.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-17.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$10.1M
Modeled Uplift
$6.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.7M (vs $10.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$123K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.8M$3.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.7M$105K$3.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$588K$1.7M$2.3M$7.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$123K$123K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$959K$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$949K$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$778K$1.6M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$61K$123K$123K$123K$123K$123K$123K
Cumulative$0$2.7M$5.5M$8.2M$10.1M$10.1M$10.1M$10.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-27.7M$-27.7M-14.4%
Year 1$-28.5M+$6.7M$-21.8M-11.3%
Year 2$-29.3M+$10.1M$-19.3M-10.0%
Year 3$-30.2M+$10.1M$-20.1M-10.5%
Year 4$-31.1M+$10.1M$-21.0M-11.0%
Year 5$-32.1M+$10.1M$-22.0M-11.5%
$-276.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-241.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$34.9M
Value Created
$-22.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-44.1M
Organic Growth
$100.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-22.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.3M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$61K$92K$123K$147K
Total$5.0M$7.6M$10.1M$12.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.4%-20.8%-8.7%0.8%
P33
Net-to-Gross25.5%20.6%24.8%31.5%
P57
Occupancy52.7%49.2%59.4%71.9%
P34
Rev/Bed$823K$711K$1.2M$1.6M
P28
Exp/Bed$942K$765K$1.3M$1.7M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML