Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JAVON BEA HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JAVON BEA HOSPITAL
CCN 140239 | IL | 194 beds | Current EBITDA $36.5M → Pro Forma $55.7M (+$19.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$364.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$36.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$55.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$19.2M
Modeled Uplift
$13.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.1M (vs $19.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$233K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.3M$7.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.0M$200K$7.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.4M$14.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$233K$233K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.5M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$117K$233K$233K$233K$233K$233K$233K
Cumulative$0$5.2M$10.4M$15.5M$19.2M$19.2M$19.2M$19.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.2x
9.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x
10.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
11.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
12.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$36.5M$36.5M10.0%
Year 1$37.6M+$12.8M$50.4M13.8%
Year 2$38.7M+$19.2M$57.9M15.9%
Year 3$39.9M+$19.2M$59.1M16.2%
Year 4$41.1M+$19.2M$60.3M16.5%
Year 5$42.3M+$19.2M$61.5M16.9%
$365.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$676.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$311.4M
Value Created
$61.5M
Exit EBITDA
$58.2M
Organic Growth
$191.7M
RCM Value Creation
$61.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.5M$7.3M$8.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$117K$175K$233K$280K
Total$9.6M$14.4M$19.2M$23.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.0%-21.0%-8.3%1.9%
P85
Net-to-Gross30.7%20.8%25.3%32.6%
P67
Occupancy55.2%43.1%58.5%70.5%
P43
Rev/Bed$1.9M$685K$1.2M$1.6M
P83
Exp/Bed$1.7M$751K$1.2M$1.7M
P72

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML