Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 140223 | IL | 543 beds | Current EBITDA $168.4M → Pro Forma $225.4M (+$57.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.08B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$168.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$57.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$225.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$41.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$57.0M
Modeled Uplift
$40.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$16.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $40.3M (vs $57.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$21.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$21.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$13.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$693K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$57.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$21.7M$21.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$20.8M$596K$21.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.3M$9.9M$13.2M$41.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$693K$693K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.4M$10.8M$16.2M$21.7M$21.7M$21.7M$21.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.4M$10.7M$16.1M$21.4M$21.4M$21.4M$21.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.4M$8.8M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$347K$693K$693K$693K$693K$693K$693K
Cumulative$0$15.5M$31.0M$46.2M$57.0M$57.0M$57.0M$57.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $57.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$168.4M$168.4M15.6%
Year 1$173.5M+$38.0M$211.5M19.5%
Year 2$178.7M+$57.0M$235.6M21.8%
Year 3$184.0M+$57.0M$241.0M22.3%
Year 4$189.6M+$57.0M$246.5M22.8%
Year 5$195.2M+$57.0M$252.2M23.3%
$1.68B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.77B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.09B
Value Created
$252.2M
Exit EBITDA
$268.2M
Organic Growth
$569.8M
RCM Value Creation
$252.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$10.8M$16.2M$21.7M$26.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$10.7M$16.1M$21.4M$25.7M
A/R Days Reduction$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$15.8M
Clean Claim Rate$347K$520K$693K$832K
Total$28.5M$42.7M$57.0M$68.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.6%-13.2%-8.2%2.0%
P93
Net-to-Gross32.2%20.8%25.1%30.0%
P82
Occupancy82.9%65.8%71.9%82.9%
P72
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.4M$1.9M$2.7M
P54
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.5M$1.8M$3.0M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML