Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ELMHURST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ELMHURST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 140200 | IL | 258 beds | Current EBITDA $18.7M → Pro Forma $34.3M (+$15.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$296.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$18.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$34.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$15.6M
Modeled Uplift
$11.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.4M (vs $15.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$190K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.9M$5.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.7M$163K$5.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$910K$2.7M$3.6M$11.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$190K$190K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$95K$190K$190K$190K$190K$190K$190K
Cumulative$0$4.2M$8.5M$12.7M$15.6M$15.6M$15.6M$15.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x74% / 16.2x
9.0x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.0x
10.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
11.0x49% / 7.3x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
12.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
29%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 29% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$18.7M$18.7M6.3%
Year 1$19.3M+$10.4M$29.7M10.0%
Year 2$19.9M+$15.6M$35.5M12.0%
Year 3$20.5M+$15.6M$36.1M12.2%
Year 4$21.1M+$15.6M$36.7M12.4%
Year 5$21.7M+$15.6M$37.3M12.6%
$187.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$410.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$223.1M
Value Created
$37.3M
Exit EBITDA
$29.8M
Organic Growth
$156.0M
RCM Value Creation
$37.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$95K$142K$190K$228K
Total$7.8M$11.7M$15.6M$18.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 81 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.3%-18.8%-8.0%2.7%
P79
Net-to-Gross17.0%20.6%24.6%31.4%
P8
Occupancy84.2%50.2%59.8%71.9%
P86
Rev/Bed$1.1M$836K$1.3M$1.7M
P41
Exp/Bed$1.1M$896K$1.3M$1.8M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML