Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. ELIZABETH HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 01:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. ELIZABETH HOSPITAL
CCN 140187 | IL | 144 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.6M → Pro Forma $6.0M (+$15.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 140187

ST. ELIZABETH HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$296.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$15.6M
Modeled Uplift
$11.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.8M (vs $15.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$190K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.9M$5.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.7M$163K$5.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$909K$2.7M$3.6M$11.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$190K$190K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$95K$190K$190K$190K$190K$190K$190K
Cumulative$0$4.2M$8.5M$12.6M$15.6M$15.6M$15.6M$15.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-13.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
20.0x
Headroom (turns)
307%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 307% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -13.5x, adding 112.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.6M$-9.6M-3.2%
Year 1$-9.9M+$10.4M$529K0.2%
Year 2$-10.2M+$15.6M$5.4M1.8%
Year 3$-10.5M+$15.6M$5.1M1.7%
Year 4$-10.8M+$15.6M$4.8M1.6%
Year 5$-11.1M+$15.6M$4.5M1.5%
$-95.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$49.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$145.1M
Value Created
$4.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-15.2M
Organic Growth
$155.8M
RCM Value Creation
$4.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$95K$142K$190K$227K
Total$7.8M$11.7M$15.6M$18.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.2%-18.9%-7.5%4.1%
P61
Net-to-Gross22.0%21.0%25.0%33.1%
P32
Occupancy86.4%41.8%53.8%68.9%
P94
Rev/Bed$2.1M$638K$1.1M$1.6M
P86
Exp/Bed$2.1M$643K$1.2M$1.7M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML