Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIVERSIDE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIVERSIDE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 140186 | IL | 256 beds | Current EBITDA $-25.1M → Pro Forma $-4.6M (+$20.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$389.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-25.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$20.5M
Modeled Uplift
$13.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.2M (vs $20.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$249K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.8M$7.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.5M$214K$7.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.7M$14.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$249K$249K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$125K$249K$249K$249K$249K$249K$249K
Cumulative$0$5.6M$11.1M$16.6M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-25.1M$-25.1M-6.4%
Year 1$-25.8M+$13.6M$-12.2M-3.1%
Year 2$-26.6M+$20.5M$-6.1M-1.6%
Year 3$-27.4M+$20.5M$-6.9M-1.8%
Year 4$-28.2M+$20.5M$-7.7M-2.0%
Year 5$-29.0M+$20.5M$-8.6M-2.2%
$-250.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-94.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$156.2M
Value Created
$-8.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-39.9M
Organic Growth
$204.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$9.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$9.2M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$125K$187K$249K$299K
Total$10.2M$15.4M$20.5M$24.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 81 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-6.4%-18.9%-8.0%2.7%
P56
Net-to-Gross27.2%20.6%24.2%31.4%
P63
Occupancy42.3%50.2%59.6%71.9%
P15
Rev/Bed$1.5M$825K$1.3M$1.7M
P67
Exp/Bed$1.6M$806K$1.3M$1.7M
P64

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML