Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY
CCN 140179 | IL | 227 beds | Current EBITDA $-61.0M → Pro Forma $-48.1M (+$12.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$244.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-61.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-48.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$12.9M
Modeled Uplift
$9.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.0M (vs $12.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$157K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.9M$4.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.7M$135K$4.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$751K$2.2M$3.0M$9.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$157K$157K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.7M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$993K$2.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$78K$157K$157K$157K$157K$157K$157K
Cumulative$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.4M$12.9M$12.9M$12.9M$12.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-61.0M$-61.0M-24.9%
Year 1$-62.8M+$8.6M$-54.2M-22.1%
Year 2$-64.7M+$12.9M$-51.8M-21.2%
Year 3$-66.6M+$12.9M$-53.8M-22.0%
Year 4$-68.6M+$12.9M$-55.8M-22.8%
Year 5$-70.7M+$12.9M$-57.8M-23.6%
$-609.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-636.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$-26.1M
Value Created
$-57.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-97.1M
Organic Growth
$128.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-57.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.4M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$78K$118K$157K$188K
Total$6.4M$9.7M$12.9M$15.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-24.9%-21.0%-9.3%0.8%
P16
Net-to-Gross20.6%20.6%24.8%31.5%
P25
Occupancy68.1%48.5%59.2%71.8%
P62
Rev/Bed$1.1M$719K$1.2M$1.6M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.3M$770K$1.2M$1.7M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML