Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — IROQUOIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — IROQUOIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 140167 | IL | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $4K → Pro Forma $1.8M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$701K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$683K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$676K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$415K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$683K$683K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$657K$19K$676K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$105K$311K$415K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$171K$341K$512K$683K$683K$683K$683K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$169K$338K$507K$676K$676K$676K$676K
A/R Days Reduction$0$138K$277K$415K$415K$415K$415K$415K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$489K$978K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x403% / 3217.4x414% / 3575.2x424% / 3933.1x428% / 4112.0x433% / 4290.9x
9.0x391% / 2859.5x402% / 3177.6x411% / 3495.7x416% / 3654.8x420% / 3813.8x
10.0x381% / 2573.3x391% / 2859.5x401% / 3145.8x405% / 3288.9x409% / 3432.1x
11.0x372% / 2339.0x382% / 2599.3x391% / 2859.5x396% / 2989.7x400% / 3119.8x
12.0x364% / 2143.8x374% / 2382.4x383% / 2621.0x387% / 2740.2x391% / 2859.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.5x
Headroom (turns)
100%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 100% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.0x, adding 8.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4K$4K0.0%
Year 1$4K+$1.2M$1.2M3.5%
Year 2$4K+$1.8M$1.8M5.3%
Year 3$4K+$1.8M$1.8M5.3%
Year 4$5K+$1.8M$1.8M5.3%
Year 5$5K+$1.8M$1.8M5.3%
$41K
Entry EV (10x)
$19.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.8M
Value Created
$1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$7K
Organic Growth
$18.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$341K$512K$683K$819K
Denial Rate Reductio$338K$507K$676K$811K
A/R Days Reduction$208K$312K$415K$499K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$898K$1.3M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.0%-7.4%-1.9%5.7%
P58
Net-to-Gross47.6%33.4%42.5%48.7%
P70
Occupancy15.7%17.4%26.2%40.8%
P19
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.1M$1.5M$2.0M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML