Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPRINGFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPRINGFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 140148 | IL | 389 beds | Current EBITDA $-106.0M → Pro Forma $-67.4M (+$38.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$732.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-106.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$38.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-67.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$28.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$38.6M
Modeled Uplift
$27.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $27.8M (vs $38.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$14.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$14.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$469K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$38.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$14.7M$14.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.1M$403K$14.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.2M$6.7M$8.9M$28.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$469K$469K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.7M$7.3M$11.0M$14.7M$14.7M$14.7M$14.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.6M$7.3M$10.9M$14.5M$14.5M$14.5M$14.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.0M$5.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$235K$469K$469K$469K$469K$469K$469K
Cumulative$0$10.5M$21.0M$31.3M$38.6M$38.6M$38.6M$38.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $38.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-106.0M$-106.0M-14.5%
Year 1$-109.1M+$25.7M$-83.4M-11.4%
Year 2$-112.4M+$38.6M$-73.9M-10.1%
Year 3$-115.8M+$38.6M$-77.2M-10.5%
Year 4$-119.3M+$38.6M$-80.7M-11.0%
Year 5$-122.8M+$38.6M$-84.3M-11.5%
$-1.06B
Entry EV (10x)
$-927.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$132.5M
Value Created
$-84.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-168.8M
Organic Growth
$385.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-84.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.3M$11.0M$14.7M$17.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.3M$10.9M$14.5M$17.4M
A/R Days Reduction$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M
Clean Claim Rate$235K$352K$469K$563K
Total$19.3M$28.9M$38.6M$46.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.5%-13.6%-7.4%3.2%
P21
Net-to-Gross25.1%21.1%24.9%29.7%
P52
Occupancy81.6%55.3%68.1%74.9%
P78
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.2M$1.5M$2.1M
P67
Exp/Bed$2.2M$1.2M$1.6M$2.2M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML