Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARGARETS HEALTH - SPRING VALLEY 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARGARETS HEALTH - SPRING VALLEY
CCN 140143 | IL | 44 beds | Current EBITDA $-11.2M → Pro Forma $-6.5M (+$4.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$88.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-11.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.6M
Modeled Uplift
$3.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.1M (vs $4.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$56K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$48K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$270K$801K$1.1M$3.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$56K$56K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$440K$881K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$436K$872K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$357K$714K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$28K$56K$56K$56K$56K$56K$56K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-11.2M$-11.2M-12.7%
Year 1$-11.5M+$3.1M$-8.4M-9.5%
Year 2$-11.8M+$4.6M$-7.2M-8.2%
Year 3$-12.2M+$4.6M$-7.6M-8.6%
Year 4$-12.6M+$4.6M$-7.9M-9.0%
Year 5$-12.9M+$4.6M$-8.3M-9.4%
$-111.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-91.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.2M
Value Created
$-8.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-17.8M
Organic Growth
$46.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$881K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$872K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$536K$804K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$28K$42K$56K$68K
Total$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$5.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 77 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.7%-9.2%-2.6%9.7%
P21
Net-to-Gross30.9%31.6%41.9%50.1%
P24
Occupancy34.3%19.5%29.4%43.4%
P58
Rev/Bed$2.0M$890K$1.4M$2.0M
P75
Exp/Bed$2.3M$1.1M$1.4M$1.9M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML