Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHERN ILLINOIS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHERN ILLINOIS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 140116 | IL | 259 beds | Current EBITDA $-80.4M → Pro Forma $-46.7M (+$33.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$640.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-80.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$33.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-46.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$24.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$33.7M
Modeled Uplift
$25.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $25.7M (vs $33.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$410K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$33.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.8M$12.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.3M$353K$12.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$5.8M$7.8M$24.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$410K$410K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.2M$6.4M$9.6M$12.8M$12.8M$12.8M$12.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.2M$6.3M$9.5M$12.7M$12.7M$12.7M$12.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$205K$410K$410K$410K$410K$410K$410K
Cumulative$0$9.2M$18.4M$27.3M$33.7M$33.7M$33.7M$33.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $33.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-80.4M$-80.4M-12.5%
Year 1$-82.8M+$22.5M$-60.3M-9.4%
Year 2$-85.3M+$33.7M$-51.6M-8.0%
Year 3$-87.8M+$33.7M$-54.1M-8.4%
Year 4$-90.5M+$33.7M$-56.7M-8.9%
Year 5$-93.2M+$33.7M$-59.5M-9.3%
$-803.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-654.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$149.7M
Value Created
$-59.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-128.0M
Organic Growth
$337.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-59.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.4M$9.6M$12.8M$15.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.3M$9.5M$12.7M$15.2M
A/R Days Reduction$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$9.4M
Clean Claim Rate$205K$308K$410K$492K
Total$16.9M$25.3M$33.7M$40.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 81 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.5%-18.8%-8.0%2.7%
P37
Net-to-Gross20.4%20.6%24.6%31.4%
P22
Occupancy90.5%50.2%59.8%71.9%
P94
Rev/Bed$2.5M$836K$1.3M$1.7M
P90
Exp/Bed$2.8M$896K$1.3M$1.8M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML