Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MORRIS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MORRIS HOSPITAL
CCN 140101 | IL | 89 beds | Current EBITDA $3.6M → Pro Forma $14.6M (+$11.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$210.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$11.1M
Modeled Uplift
$7.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.6M (vs $11.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$135K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.2M$4.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.1M$116K$4.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$647K$1.9M$2.6M$8.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$135K$135K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$855K$1.7M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$67K$135K$135K$135K$135K$135K$135K
Cumulative$0$3.0M$6.0M$9.0M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x95% / 28.0x99% / 31.5x104% / 35.0x106% / 36.7x108% / 38.5x
9.0x90% / 24.6x94% / 27.7x98% / 30.8x100% / 32.3x102% / 33.8x
10.0x85% / 21.8x90% / 24.6x94% / 27.4x96% / 28.7x98% / 30.1x
11.0x81% / 19.5x86% / 22.0x90% / 24.6x92% / 25.8x93% / 27.1x
12.0x77% / 17.6x82% / 19.9x86% / 22.2x88% / 23.4x90% / 24.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.4x
Headroom (turns)
68%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 68% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.1x, adding 6.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.6M$3.6M1.7%
Year 1$3.7M+$7.4M$11.1M5.2%
Year 2$3.8M+$11.1M$14.9M7.0%
Year 3$3.9M+$11.1M$15.0M7.1%
Year 4$4.0M+$11.1M$15.1M7.2%
Year 5$4.1M+$11.1M$15.2M7.2%
$35.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$167.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$131.7M
Value Created
$15.2M
Exit EBITDA
$5.7M
Organic Growth
$110.9M
RCM Value Creation
$15.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$67K$101K$135K$162K
Total$5.5M$8.3M$11.1M$13.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 78 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.7%-22.1%-8.2%6.1%
P68
Net-to-Gross24.4%22.3%27.9%38.3%
P36
Occupancy44.8%34.5%49.9%68.6%
P45
Rev/Bed$2.4M$580K$988K$1.6M
P91
Exp/Bed$2.3M$532K$1.2M$1.7M
P90

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML