Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PALOS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PALOS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 140062 | IL | 342 beds | Current EBITDA $-115.2M → Pro Forma $-94.8M (+$20.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$387.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-115.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-94.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$20.4M
Modeled Uplift
$14.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.2M (vs $20.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$248K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.7M$7.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.5M$213K$7.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.7M$14.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$248K$248K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$124K$248K$248K$248K$248K$248K$248K
Cumulative$0$5.5M$11.1M$16.5M$20.4M$20.4M$20.4M$20.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-115.2M$-115.2M-29.8%
Year 1$-118.6M+$13.6M$-105.1M-27.1%
Year 2$-122.2M+$20.4M$-101.8M-26.3%
Year 3$-125.9M+$20.4M$-105.5M-27.3%
Year 4$-129.6M+$20.4M$-109.3M-28.2%
Year 5$-133.5M+$20.4M$-113.2M-29.2%
$-1.15B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.24B
Exit EV (11x)
$-93.0M
Value Created
$-113.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-183.5M
Organic Growth
$203.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-113.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$9.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.8M$5.7M$7.7M$9.2M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.5M$4.7M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$124K$186K$248K$297K
Total$10.2M$15.3M$20.4M$24.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-29.8%-14.5%-6.8%3.1%
P5
Net-to-Gross20.2%20.9%25.0%30.4%
P16
Occupancy70.3%52.1%65.8%72.2%
P63
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.0M$1.4M$2.0M
P28
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.0M$1.6M$1.9M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML