Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GALESBURG COTTAGE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GALESBURG COTTAGE HOSPITAL
CCN 140040 | IL | 96 beds | Current EBITDA $71.5M → Pro Forma $76.0M (+$4.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$86.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$71.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$76.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$4.6M
Modeled Uplift
$2.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.7M (vs $4.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$55K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$48K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$266K$789K$1.1M$3.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$55K$55K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$434K$867K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$429K$858K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$352K$703K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$28K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
9.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
10.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
11.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.4x
12.0x22% / 2.7x28% / 3.4x32% / 4.0x34% / 4.4x36% / 4.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
8.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.5x
Headroom (turns)
-22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 8.0x, adding 0.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$71.5M$71.5M82.4%
Year 1$73.6M+$3.0M$76.7M88.4%
Year 2$75.8M+$4.6M$80.4M92.7%
Year 3$78.1M+$4.6M$82.7M95.3%
Year 4$80.5M+$4.6M$85.0M98.1%
Year 5$82.9M+$4.6M$87.4M100.8%
$714.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$961.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$246.9M
Value Created
$87.4M
Exit EBITDA
$113.9M
Organic Growth
$45.6M
RCM Value Creation
$87.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$867K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$858K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$528K$791K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$28K$42K$55K$67K
Total$2.3M$3.4M$4.6M$5.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 80 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin82.4%-22.0%-8.2%4.2%
P97
Net-to-Gross33.1%21.3%25.9%37.7%
P66
Occupancy9.2%34.9%51.6%69.2%
P0
Rev/Bed$903K$552K$933K$1.6M
P48
Exp/Bed$159K$519K$1.0M$1.7M
P1

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML