Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ADVOCATE SHERMAN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ADVOCATE SHERMAN HOSPITAL
CCN 140030 | IL | 255 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.1M → Pro Forma $13.6M (+$18.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$356.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$18.7M
Modeled Uplift
$12.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.7M (vs $18.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$228K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.1M$7.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.9M$196K$7.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$228K$228K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$114K$228K$228K$228K$228K$228K$228K
Cumulative$0$5.1M$10.2M$15.2M$18.7M$18.7M$18.7M$18.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.7x
Headroom (turns)
149%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 149% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.2x, adding 102.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.1M$-5.1M-1.4%
Year 1$-5.2M+$12.5M$7.2M2.0%
Year 2$-5.4M+$18.7M$13.3M3.7%
Year 3$-5.6M+$18.7M$13.2M3.7%
Year 4$-5.7M+$18.7M$13.0M3.7%
Year 5$-5.9M+$18.7M$12.8M3.6%
$-51.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$141.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$192.0M
Value Created
$12.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.1M
Organic Growth
$187.3M
RCM Value Creation
$12.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$114K$171K$228K$273K
Total$9.4M$14.1M$18.7M$22.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 81 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.4%-18.9%-8.0%2.7%
P68
Net-to-Gross22.8%20.6%24.2%31.4%
P42
Occupancy58.6%50.2%59.6%71.9%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.4M$825K$1.3M$1.7M
P60
Exp/Bed$1.4M$806K$1.3M$1.7M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML