Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HERRIN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HERRIN HOSPITAL
CCN 140011 | IL | 85 beds | Current EBITDA $40.0M → Pro Forma $50.5M (+$10.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$198.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$40.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$50.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$10.4M
Modeled Uplift
$8.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.0M (vs $10.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$127K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.0M$4.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.8M$109K$3.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$609K$1.8M$2.4M$7.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$127K$127K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$992K$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$982K$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$805K$1.6M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$63K$127K$127K$127K$127K$127K$127K
Cumulative$0$2.8M$5.7M$8.5M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$40.0M$40.0M20.2%
Year 1$41.2M+$7.0M$48.2M24.3%
Year 2$42.5M+$10.4M$52.9M26.7%
Year 3$43.7M+$10.4M$54.2M27.3%
Year 4$45.0M+$10.4M$55.5M28.0%
Year 5$46.4M+$10.4M$56.8M28.6%
$400.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$625.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$225.0M
Value Created
$56.8M
Exit EBITDA
$63.8M
Organic Growth
$104.4M
RCM Value Creation
$56.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$63K$95K$127K$152K
Total$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$12.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 74 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.2%-22.1%-8.3%3.9%
P89
Net-to-Gross24.8%22.2%27.9%38.3%
P39
Occupancy83.3%33.3%44.4%67.4%
P89
Rev/Bed$2.3M$580K$988K$1.6M
P87
Exp/Bed$1.9M$532K$1.2M$1.7M
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML