Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PRESENCE ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PRESENCE ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 140007 | IL | 425 beds | Current EBITDA $-35.4M → Pro Forma $-16.9M (+$18.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$352.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-35.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-16.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$18.6M
Modeled Uplift
$11.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.8M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.7M (vs $18.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$226K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.1M$7.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.8M$194K$7.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$226K$226K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$113K$226K$226K$226K$226K$226K$226K
Cumulative$0$5.1M$10.1M$15.0M$18.6M$18.6M$18.6M$18.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-35.4M$-35.4M-10.0%
Year 1$-36.5M+$12.4M$-24.1M-6.8%
Year 2$-37.6M+$18.6M$-19.0M-5.4%
Year 3$-38.7M+$18.6M$-20.1M-5.7%
Year 4$-39.9M+$18.6M$-21.3M-6.0%
Year 5$-41.1M+$18.6M$-22.5M-6.4%
$-354.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-247.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$106.6M
Value Created
$-22.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-56.4M
Organic Growth
$185.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-22.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$113K$169K$226K$271K
Total$9.3M$13.9M$18.6M$22.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.0%-14.4%-6.9%3.1%
P44
Net-to-Gross16.5%20.9%24.8%29.3%
P2
Occupancy46.8%56.6%69.7%79.8%
P11
Rev/Bed$830K$1.3M$1.5M$2.2M
P7
Exp/Bed$913K$1.3M$1.6M$2.3M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML