Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAINT ALPHONSUS REGIONAL REHABILITAT 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAINT ALPHONSUS REGIONAL REHABILITAT
CCN 133028 | ID | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $3.8M → Pro Forma $4.9M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$870K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$876K
Risk-Adjusted
-$318K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$454K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$449K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$276K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$454K$454K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$437K$12K$449K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$70K$206K$276K$870K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$113K$227K$340K$454K$454K$454K$454K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$112K$225K$337K$449K$449K$449K$449K
A/R Days Reduction$0$92K$184K$276K$276K$276K$276K$276K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$325K$650K$968K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.8M$3.8M16.5%
Year 1$3.9M+$796K$4.7M20.5%
Year 2$4.0M+$1.2M$5.2M22.8%
Year 3$4.1M+$1.2M$5.3M23.3%
Year 4$4.2M+$1.2M$5.4M23.9%
Year 5$4.3M+$1.2M$5.5M24.4%
$37.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$61.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.5M
Value Created
$5.5M
Exit EBITDA
$6.0M
Organic Growth
$11.9M
RCM Value Creation
$5.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$227K$340K$454K$545K
Denial Rate Reductio$225K$337K$449K$539K
A/R Days Reduction$138K$207K$276K$331K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$15K$17K
Total$597K$895K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.5%-5.9%-2.3%3.0%
P91
Net-to-Gross63.1%49.0%58.4%63.4%
P70
Occupancy84.8%19.6%34.9%51.9%
P91
Rev/Bed$567K$872K$1.6M$3.1M
P9
Exp/Bed$473K$983K$1.7M$2.6M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML