Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF THE NORTH 2026-04-26 05:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF THE NORTH
CCN 133027 | ID | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $2.3M → Pro Forma $3.2M (+$942K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$942K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$687K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$942K
Modeled Uplift
$708K
Risk-Adjusted
-$234K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$358K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$355K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$218K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$942K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$358K$358K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$345K$10K$355K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$55K$163K$218K$687K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$90K$179K$269K$358K$358K$358K$358K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$89K$177K$266K$355K$355K$355K$355K
A/R Days Reduction$0$73K$145K$218K$218K$218K$218K$218K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$257K$513K$764K$942K$942K$942K$942K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $942K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
9.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.3M$2.3M12.8%
Year 1$2.4M+$628K$3.0M16.7%
Year 2$2.4M+$942K$3.4M18.9%
Year 3$2.5M+$942K$3.5M19.3%
Year 4$2.6M+$942K$3.5M19.7%
Year 5$2.7M+$942K$3.6M20.1%
$23.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$39.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.7M
Value Created
$3.6M
Exit EBITDA
$3.7M
Organic Growth
$9.4M
RCM Value Creation
$3.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$179K$269K$358K$430K
Denial Rate Reductio$177K$266K$355K$426K
A/R Days Reduction$109K$163K$218K$262K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$11K$14K
Total$471K$707K$942K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.8%-6.9%-2.6%2.4%
P87
Net-to-Gross78.7%49.7%58.8%63.5%
P97
Occupancy94.4%20.0%27.5%50.6%
P97
Rev/Bed$597K$925K$1.6M$3.0M
P10
Exp/Bed$520K$1.0M$1.7M$2.6M
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML