Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL OF BOISE 2026-04-26 03:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL OF BOISE
CCN 132002 | ID | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-628K → Pro Forma $377K (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-628K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$377K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$733K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$711K
Risk-Adjusted
-$293K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$382K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$378K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$232K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$382K$382K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$368K$11K$378K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$59K$174K$232K$733K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$96K$191K$287K$382K$382K$382K$382K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$95K$189K$284K$378K$378K$378K$378K
A/R Days Reduction$0$77K$155K$232K$232K$232K$232K$232K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$274K$547K$815K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-14.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
20.6x
Headroom (turns)
317%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 317% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -14.1x, adding 113.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-628K$-628K-3.3%
Year 1$-647K+$670K$23K0.1%
Year 2$-667K+$1.0M$338K1.8%
Year 3$-687K+$1.0M$318K1.7%
Year 4$-707K+$1.0M$298K1.6%
Year 5$-728K+$1.0M$276K1.4%
$-6.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.3M
Value Created
$276K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.0M
Organic Growth
$10.0M
RCM Value Creation
$276K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$191K$287K$382K$458K
Denial Rate Reductio$189K$284K$378K$454K
A/R Days Reduction$116K$174K$232K$279K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$15K
Total$502K$754K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.3%-5.9%-2.3%3.0%
P39
Net-to-Gross49.1%49.0%58.4%63.4%
P30
Occupancy71.3%19.6%34.9%51.9%
P87
Rev/Bed$478K$872K$1.6M$3.1M
P4
Exp/Bed$493K$983K$1.7M$2.6M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML