Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LOST RIVERS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LOST RIVERS HOSPITAL
CCN 131324 | ID | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.3M → Pro Forma $-1.7M (+$592K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$592K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+530bps
Margin Improvement
$429K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$592K
Modeled Uplift
$344K
Risk-Adjusted
-$248K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$223K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$223K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$136K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$592K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$223K$223K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$215K$8K$223K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$34K$102K$136K$429K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT67.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$56K$112K$168K$223K$223K$223K$223K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$56K$112K$167K$223K$223K$223K$223K
A/R Days Reduction$0$45K$91K$136K$136K$136K$136K$136K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$162K$324K$481K$592K$592K$592K$592K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $592K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.3M$-2.3M-20.6%
Year 1$-2.4M+$395K$-2.0M-17.7%
Year 2$-2.4M+$592K$-1.9M-16.6%
Year 3$-2.5M+$592K$-1.9M-17.2%
Year 4$-2.6M+$592K$-2.0M-17.9%
Year 5$-2.7M+$592K$-2.1M-18.6%
$-23.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-22.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$178K
Value Created
$-2.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.7M
Organic Growth
$5.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$112K$168K$223K$268K
Denial Rate Reductio$112K$167K$223K$268K
A/R Days Reduction$68K$102K$136K$163K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$296K$444K$592K$711K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.6%-10.3%-5.9%-2.0%
P0
Net-to-Gross70.0%56.7%61.0%67.8%
P79
Occupancy3.7%16.5%24.8%36.3%
P4
Rev/Bed$798K$996K$1.6M$2.4M
P4
Exp/Bed$963K$1.1M$1.8M$2.5M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML