Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MINIDOKA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MINIDOKA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 131319 | ID | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $-646K → Pro Forma $1.9M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$48.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-646K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$915K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$960K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$950K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$584K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$960K$960K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$924K$26K$950K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$147K$437K$584K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$240K$480K$720K$960K$960K$960K$960K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$238K$475K$713K$950K$950K$950K$950K
A/R Days Reduction$0$195K$389K$584K$584K$584K$584K$584K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$687K$1.4M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.4x
Headroom (turns)
145%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 145% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.9x, adding 101.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-646K$-646K-1.3%
Year 1$-666K+$1.7M$1.0M2.1%
Year 2$-686K+$2.5M$1.8M3.8%
Year 3$-706K+$2.5M$1.8M3.8%
Year 4$-728K+$2.5M$1.8M3.7%
Year 5$-749K+$2.5M$1.8M3.7%
$-6.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$19.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.0M
Value Created
$1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.0M
Organic Growth
$25.2M
RCM Value Creation
$1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$480K$720K$960K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$475K$713K$950K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$292K$438K$584K$701K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 32 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.3%-8.8%-3.3%2.3%
P66
Net-to-Gross58.4%52.4%59.8%66.2%
P41
Occupancy25.6%18.9%25.7%48.5%
P47
Rev/Bed$2.1M$917K$1.6M$2.6M
P62
Exp/Bed$2.1M$1.0M$1.8M$2.6M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML