Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BEAR LAKE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BEAR LAKE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 131316 | ID | 21 beds | Current EBITDA $702K → Pro Forma $2.4M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$702K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$651K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$648K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$641K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$394K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$648K$648K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$624K$18K$641K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$99K$295K$394K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$162K$324K$486K$648K$648K$648K$648K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$160K$321K$481K$641K$641K$641K$641K
A/R Days Reduction$0$131K$263K$394K$394K$394K$394K$394K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$464K$928K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x87% / 23.0x92% / 25.9x96% / 28.8x98% / 30.3x100% / 31.7x
9.0x82% / 20.1x87% / 22.6x91% / 25.2x93% / 26.5x94% / 27.8x
10.0x78% / 17.7x82% / 20.1x86% / 22.4x88% / 23.6x90% / 24.7x
11.0x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.2x
12.0x70% / 14.2x74% / 16.2x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.1x82% / 20.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.0x
Headroom (turns)
62%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 62% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.5x, adding 6.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$702K$702K2.2%
Year 1$723K+$1.1M$1.9M5.7%
Year 2$745K+$1.7M$2.4M7.6%
Year 3$767K+$1.7M$2.5M7.6%
Year 4$790K+$1.7M$2.5M7.7%
Year 5$814K+$1.7M$2.5M7.8%
$7.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$27.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.7M
Value Created
$2.5M
Exit EBITDA
$1.1M
Organic Growth
$17.0M
RCM Value Creation
$2.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$324K$486K$648K$777K
Denial Rate Reductio$321K$481K$641K$770K
A/R Days Reduction$197K$296K$394K$473K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$16K$21K$25K
Total$852K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 32 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.2%-8.8%-3.5%0.4%
P75
Net-to-Gross63.7%53.7%60.2%66.2%
P66
Occupancy19.6%18.9%25.7%47.0%
P25
Rev/Bed$1.5M$917K$1.5M$2.4M
P47
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.0M$1.6M$2.5M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML