Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES MCCALL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES MCCALL
CCN 131312 | ID | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $3.6M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$46.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$873K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$936K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$926K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$569K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$936K$936K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$901K$26K$926K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$144K$426K$569K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT69.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$234K$468K$702K$936K$936K$936K$936K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$232K$463K$695K$926K$926K$926K$926K
A/R Days Reduction$0$190K$380K$569K$569K$569K$569K$569K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$670K$1.3M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x83% / 20.6x88% / 23.3x92% / 25.9x94% / 27.3x96% / 28.6x
9.0x78% / 18.0x83% / 20.3x87% / 22.7x89% / 23.9x90% / 25.1x
10.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 18.0x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.2x86% / 22.2x
11.0x70% / 14.1x74% / 16.1x78% / 18.0x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x
12.0x66% / 12.7x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.2x76% / 17.1x78% / 18.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
58%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 58% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M2.5%
Year 1$1.2M+$1.6M$2.8M6.1%
Year 2$1.2M+$2.5M$3.7M7.9%
Year 3$1.3M+$2.5M$3.7M8.0%
Year 4$1.3M+$2.5M$3.8M8.1%
Year 5$1.4M+$2.5M$3.8M8.2%
$11.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$42.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$30.3M
Value Created
$3.8M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$24.6M
RCM Value Creation
$3.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$468K$702K$936K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$463K$695K$926K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$285K$427K$569K$683K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$22K$30K$36K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.5%-9.9%-5.4%-1.3%
P83
Net-to-Gross55.6%57.1%61.8%69.1%
P21
Occupancy24.5%16.8%24.9%40.5%
P41
Rev/Bed$3.1M$961K$1.6M$2.4M
P79
Exp/Bed$3.0M$1.0M$1.7M$2.5M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML