Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES JEROME LTD 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES JEROME LTD
CCN 131310 | ID | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $-435K → Pro Forma $614K (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-435K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$614K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$765K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$686K
Risk-Adjusted
-$364K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$399K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$395K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$243K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$399K$399K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$384K$11K$395K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$61K$182K$243K$765K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT68.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$100K$200K$299K$399K$399K$399K$399K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$99K$198K$296K$395K$395K$395K$395K
A/R Days Reduction$0$81K$162K$243K$243K$243K$243K$243K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$286K$572K$851K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
12.5x
Headroom (turns)
192%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 192% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -6.0x, adding 105.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-435K$-435K-2.2%
Year 1$-448K+$700K$252K1.3%
Year 2$-462K+$1.0M$588K2.9%
Year 3$-476K+$1.0M$574K2.9%
Year 4$-490K+$1.0M$560K2.8%
Year 5$-505K+$1.0M$545K2.7%
$-4.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$6.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.3M
Value Created
$545K
Exit EBITDA
$-693K
Organic Growth
$10.5M
RCM Value Creation
$545K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$200K$299K$399K$479K
Denial Rate Reductio$198K$296K$395K$474K
A/R Days Reduction$121K$182K$243K$291K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$10K$13K$15K
Total$525K$787K$1.0M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.2%-9.7%-4.9%-0.5%
P67
Net-to-Gross60.2%56.0%61.0%68.6%
P43
Occupancy40.5%17.4%24.8%39.1%
P73
Rev/Bed$1.2M$973K$1.6M$2.4M
P33
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.0M$1.8M$2.6M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML