Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARIBOU MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARIBOU MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 131309 | ID | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.5M → Pro Forma $-275K (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-275K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$868K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$712K
Risk-Adjusted
-$478K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$452K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$448K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$275K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$452K$452K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$435K$12K$448K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$69K$206K$275K$868K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$113K$226K$339K$452K$452K$452K$452K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$112K$224K$336K$448K$448K$448K$448K
A/R Days Reduction$0$92K$184K$275K$275K$275K$275K$275K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$324K$648K$965K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.5M$-1.5M-6.5%
Year 1$-1.5M+$793K$-716K-3.2%
Year 2$-1.6M+$1.2M$-364K-1.6%
Year 3$-1.6M+$1.2M$-411K-1.8%
Year 4$-1.6M+$1.2M$-459K-2.0%
Year 5$-1.7M+$1.2M$-508K-2.2%
$-14.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-5.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.1M
Value Created
$-508K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.3M
Organic Growth
$11.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-508K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$226K$339K$452K$543K
Denial Rate Reductio$224K$336K$448K$538K
A/R Days Reduction$138K$206K$275K$330K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$595K$893K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 32 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-6.5%-8.8%-3.3%2.3%
P34
Net-to-Gross65.8%52.4%59.8%66.2%
P72
Occupancy15.3%18.9%25.7%48.5%
P16
Rev/Bed$905K$917K$1.6M$2.6M
P22
Exp/Bed$963K$1.0M$1.8M$2.6M
P19

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML