Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ONEIDA COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ONEIDA COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 131303 | ID | 11 beds | Current EBITDA $-614K → Pro Forma $134K (+$749K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-614K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$749K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$134K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$545K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$749K
Modeled Uplift
$482K
Risk-Adjusted
-$267K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$284K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$282K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$173K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$749K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$284K$284K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$274K$8K$282K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$44K$129K$173K$545K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT70.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$71K$142K$213K$284K$284K$284K$284K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$70K$141K$211K$282K$282K$282K$282K
A/R Days Reduction$0$58K$115K$173K$173K$173K$173K$173K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$204K$408K$607K$749K$749K$749K$749K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $749K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-38.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
45.2x
Headroom (turns)
695%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 695% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -38.7x, adding 137.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-614K$-614K-4.3%
Year 1$-633K+$499K$-134K-0.9%
Year 2$-652K+$749K$97K0.7%
Year 3$-671K+$749K$77K0.5%
Year 4$-691K+$749K$57K0.4%
Year 5$-712K+$749K$37K0.3%
$-6.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$402K
Exit EV (11x)
$6.5M
Value Created
$37K
Exit EBITDA
$-978K
Organic Growth
$7.5M
RCM Value Creation
$37K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$142K$213K$284K$341K
Denial Rate Reductio$141K$211K$282K$338K
A/R Days Reduction$86K$130K$173K$208K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$374K$562K$749K$898K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 16 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.3%-13.9%-7.9%-2.3%
P56
Net-to-Gross65.3%59.4%64.5%70.7%
P50
Occupancy28.8%18.7%23.4%30.3%
P69
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.2M$1.5M$1.8M
P31
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML