Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTH CANYON MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTH CANYON MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 131302 | ID | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $2.3M → Pro Forma $5.2M (+$2.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$53.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$2.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$974K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$654K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$34K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$165K$489K$654K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$34K$34K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT68.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$269K$537K$806K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$266K$532K$798K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$218K$436K$654K$654K$654K$654K$654K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K
Cumulative$0$770K$1.5M$2.3M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x70% / 14.1x74% / 16.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x
9.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x
10.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x72% / 15.2x
11.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x68% / 13.6x
12.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.7x
Headroom (turns)
41%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 41% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.8x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.3M$2.3M4.3%
Year 1$2.4M+$1.9M$4.3M8.0%
Year 2$2.5M+$2.8M$5.3M9.9%
Year 3$2.6M+$2.8M$5.4M10.0%
Year 4$2.6M+$2.8M$5.5M10.1%
Year 5$2.7M+$2.8M$5.5M10.3%
$23.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$60.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.5M
Value Created
$5.5M
Exit EBITDA
$3.7M
Organic Growth
$28.3M
RCM Value Creation
$5.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$537K$806K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$532K$798K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$327K$490K$654K$785K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$26K$34K$41K
Total$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.3%-9.7%-4.9%-0.5%
P87
Net-to-Gross57.1%56.0%61.0%68.6%
P30
Occupancy26.7%17.4%24.8%39.1%
P60
Rev/Bed$3.4M$973K$1.6M$2.4M
P80
Exp/Bed$3.2M$1.0M$1.8M$2.6M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML