Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TREASURE VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TREASURE VALLEY HOSPITAL
CCN 130063 | ID | 28 beds | Current EBITDA $41.5M → Pro Forma $47.5M (+$6.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$114.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$41.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$47.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$6.0M
Modeled Uplift
$3.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.7M (vs $6.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$73K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.3M$2.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.2M$63K$2.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$352K$1.0M$1.4M$4.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$73K$73K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$574K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$568K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$466K$932K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$37K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
9.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
10.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x
12.0x26% / 3.1x31% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.9x
Headroom (turns)
-14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.4x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$41.5M$41.5M36.1%
Year 1$42.7M+$4.0M$46.7M40.7%
Year 2$44.0M+$6.0M$50.0M43.6%
Year 3$45.3M+$6.0M$51.4M44.7%
Year 4$46.7M+$6.0M$52.7M45.9%
Year 5$48.1M+$6.0M$54.1M47.1%
$414.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$595.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$180.6M
Value Created
$54.1M
Exit EBITDA
$66.0M
Organic Growth
$60.4M
RCM Value Creation
$54.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$699K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$37K$55K$73K$88K
Total$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin36.1%-7.3%-2.8%2.3%
P97
Net-to-Gross33.1%50.2%59.1%64.7%
P3
Occupancy3.5%19.6%26.7%49.6%
P0
Rev/Bed$4.1M$913K$1.6M$2.8M
P90
Exp/Bed$2.6M$1.0M$1.7M$2.6M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML