Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PORTNEUF MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PORTNEUF MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 130028 | ID | 142 beds | Current EBITDA $52.2M → Pro Forma $72.7M (+$20.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$390.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$52.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$72.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$20.5M
Modeled Uplift
$15.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.0M (vs $20.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$250K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.8M$7.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.5M$215K$7.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.7M$15.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$250K$250K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$125K$250K$250K$250K$250K$250K$250K
Cumulative$0$5.6M$11.2M$16.7M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.4x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$52.2M$52.2M13.4%
Year 1$53.8M+$13.7M$67.4M17.3%
Year 2$55.4M+$20.5M$75.9M19.4%
Year 3$57.0M+$20.5M$77.6M19.9%
Year 4$58.7M+$20.5M$79.3M20.3%
Year 5$60.5M+$20.5M$81.0M20.8%
$521.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$891.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$369.5M
Value Created
$81.0M
Exit EBITDA
$83.1M
Organic Growth
$205.3M
RCM Value Creation
$81.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$9.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$9.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$125K$187K$250K$300K
Total$10.3M$15.4M$20.5M$24.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 11 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.4%-8.5%13.4%19.9%
P45
Net-to-Gross24.0%24.5%32.6%39.7%
P18
Occupancy69.4%48.6%60.3%74.1%
P64
Rev/Bed$2.7M$658K$1.5M$2.7M
P73
Exp/Bed$2.4M$560K$1.4M$2.4M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML