Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST LUKES MAGIC VALLEY REG MED CTR 2026-04-26 06:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST LUKES MAGIC VALLEY REG MED CTR
CCN 130002 | ID | 175 beds | Current EBITDA $-33.1M → Pro Forma $-7.7M (+$25.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$482.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-33.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$25.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$25.4M
Modeled Uplift
$17.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.6M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.8M (vs $25.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$309K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$25.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.7M$9.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.3M$266K$9.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.4M$5.9M$18.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$309K$309K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$155K$309K$309K$309K$309K$309K$309K
Cumulative$0$6.9M$13.8M$20.6M$25.4M$25.4M$25.4M$25.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $25.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-33.1M$-33.1M-6.8%
Year 1$-34.1M+$16.9M$-17.1M-3.5%
Year 2$-35.1M+$25.4M$-9.7M-2.0%
Year 3$-36.1M+$25.4M$-10.7M-2.2%
Year 4$-37.2M+$25.4M$-11.8M-2.4%
Year 5$-38.3M+$25.4M$-12.9M-2.7%
$-330.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-142.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$188.4M
Value Created
$-12.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-52.7M
Organic Growth
$254.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-12.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.8M$7.2M$9.7M$11.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
Clean Claim Rate$155K$232K$309K$371K
Total$12.7M$19.1M$25.4M$30.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 11 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-6.8%-15.0%13.4%19.9%
P27
Net-to-Gross37.5%24.5%32.6%37.9%
P55
Occupancy58.3%48.6%63.3%75.8%
P27
Rev/Bed$2.8M$658K$1.5M$2.4M
P91
Exp/Bed$2.9M$560K$1.4M$2.4M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML