Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KULA HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KULA HOSPITAL
CCN 121308 | HI | 9 beds | Current EBITDA $-16.6M → Pro Forma $-15.4M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-16.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-15.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$894K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$780K
Risk-Adjusted
-$446K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$466K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$462K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$284K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$466K$466K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$449K$13K$462K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$72K$212K$284K$894K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT72.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$117K$233K$350K$466K$466K$466K$466K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$115K$231K$346K$462K$462K$462K$462K
A/R Days Reduction$0$95K$189K$284K$284K$284K$284K$284K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$334K$668K$995K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-16.6M$-16.6M-71.2%
Year 1$-17.1M+$818K$-16.3M-69.8%
Year 2$-17.6M+$1.2M$-16.4M-70.3%
Year 3$-18.1M+$1.2M$-16.9M-72.5%
Year 4$-18.7M+$1.2M$-17.5M-74.9%
Year 5$-19.2M+$1.2M$-18.0M-77.3%
$-166.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-198.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$-32.2M
Value Created
$-18.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-26.4M
Organic Growth
$12.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-18.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$233K$350K$466K$560K
Denial Rate Reductio$231K$346K$462K$554K
A/R Days Reduction$142K$213K$284K$340K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$15K$18K
Total$613K$920K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 483 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-25.1%-8.4%2.5%
P0
Net-to-Gross60.6%41.8%58.2%72.1%
P54
Occupancy27.6%15.7%25.7%44.1%
P54
Rev/Bed$2.6M$728K$1.2M$2.1M
P81
Exp/Bed$4.4M$863K$1.4M$2.3M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML