Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KAHUKU MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KAHUKU MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 121304 | HI | 21 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.9M → Pro Forma $-693K (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-693K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$904K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$935K
Risk-Adjusted
-$305K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$472K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$467K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$287K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$472K$472K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$454K$13K$467K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$72K$215K$287K$904K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$118K$236K$354K$472K$472K$472K$472K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$117K$233K$350K$467K$467K$467K$467K
A/R Days Reduction$0$96K$191K$287K$287K$287K$287K$287K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$338K$675K$1.0M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.9M$-1.9M-8.2%
Year 1$-2.0M+$827K$-1.2M-4.9%
Year 2$-2.1M+$1.2M$-810K-3.4%
Year 3$-2.1M+$1.2M$-872K-3.7%
Year 4$-2.2M+$1.2M$-935K-4.0%
Year 5$-2.2M+$1.2M$-1.0M-4.2%
$-19.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-11.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.3M
Value Created
$-1.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.1M
Organic Growth
$12.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$236K$354K$472K$566K
Denial Rate Reductio$233K$350K$467K$560K
A/R Days Reduction$143K$215K$287K$344K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$11K$15K$18K
Total$620K$930K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.2%-24.1%-11.5%-4.6%
P50
Net-to-Gross51.8%41.1%55.4%78.2%
P38
Occupancy91.0%58.2%70.0%85.7%
P75
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.2M$1.5M$1.9M
P12
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.3M$2.1M$2.2M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML