Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WAHIAWA GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WAHIAWA GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 120004 | HI | 19 beds | Current EBITDA $-14.2M → Pro Forma $-12.9M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-14.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-12.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$929K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$975K
Risk-Adjusted
-$299K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$484K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$480K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$295K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$484K$484K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$466K$13K$480K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$74K$220K$295K$929K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$121K$242K$363K$484K$484K$484K$484K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$120K$240K$360K$480K$480K$480K$480K
A/R Days Reduction$0$98K$197K$295K$295K$295K$295K$295K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$347K$694K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-14.2M$-14.2M-58.5%
Year 1$-14.6M+$850K$-13.7M-56.7%
Year 2$-15.0M+$1.3M$-13.7M-56.8%
Year 3$-15.5M+$1.3M$-14.2M-58.6%
Year 4$-15.9M+$1.3M$-14.7M-60.5%
Year 5$-16.4M+$1.3M$-15.1M-62.5%
$-141.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-166.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$-25.0M
Value Created
$-15.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-22.6M
Organic Growth
$12.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-15.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$242K$363K$484K$581K
Denial Rate Reductio$240K$360K$480K$576K
A/R Days Reduction$147K$221K$295K$354K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$15K$19K
Total$637K$956K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-24.1%-11.5%-4.6%
P0
Net-to-Gross27.8%41.1%55.4%78.2%
P0
Occupancy94.2%58.2%70.0%85.7%
P88
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.2M$1.5M$1.9M
P25
Exp/Bed$2.0M$1.3M$2.1M$2.2M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML