Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE QUEENS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE QUEENS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 120001 | HI | 674 beds | Current EBITDA $13.8M → Pro Forma $88.8M (+$75.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.42B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$75.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$88.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$54.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$75.0M
Modeled Uplift
$53.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$21.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $53.2M (vs $75.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$28.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$28.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$17.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$912K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$75.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$28.5M$28.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$27.4M$784K$28.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.4M$13.0M$17.3M$54.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$912K$912K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$7.1M$14.2M$21.4M$28.5M$28.5M$28.5M$28.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$7.1M$14.1M$21.2M$28.2M$28.2M$28.2M$28.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.8M$11.6M$17.3M$17.3M$17.3M$17.3M$17.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$456K$912K$912K$912K$912K$912K$912K
Cumulative$0$20.4M$40.8M$60.8M$75.0M$75.0M$75.0M$75.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $75.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x114% / 45.0x119% / 50.3x123% / 55.7x126% / 58.4x128% / 61.0x
9.0x109% / 39.6x114% / 44.4x118% / 49.1x120% / 51.5x122% / 53.9x
10.0x104% / 35.3x109% / 39.6x113% / 43.9x115% / 46.0x117% / 48.2x
11.0x100% / 31.8x104% / 35.7x109% / 39.6x111% / 41.6x113% / 43.5x
12.0x96% / 28.9x101% / 32.5x105% / 36.0x107% / 37.8x109% / 39.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.2x
Headroom (turns)
80%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 80% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.3x, adding 7.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.8M$13.8M1.0%
Year 1$14.2M+$50.0M$64.2M4.5%
Year 2$14.6M+$75.0M$89.6M6.3%
Year 3$15.1M+$75.0M$90.0M6.3%
Year 4$15.5M+$75.0M$90.5M6.4%
Year 5$16.0M+$75.0M$91.0M6.4%
$137.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.00B
Exit EV (11x)
$862.6M
Value Created
$91.0M
Exit EBITDA
$22.0M
Organic Growth
$749.6M
RCM Value Creation
$91.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$14.2M$21.4M$28.5M$34.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$14.1M$21.2M$28.2M$33.9M
A/R Days Reduction$8.7M$13.0M$17.3M$20.8M
Clean Claim Rate$456K$684K$912K$1.1M
Total$37.5M$56.2M$75.0M$90.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 584 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.0%-14.0%-4.4%5.1%
P66
Net-to-Gross29.1%19.9%26.1%32.0%
P62
Occupancy89.0%66.1%75.1%82.5%
P89
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.3M$1.7M$2.4M
P68
Exp/Bed$2.1M$1.3M$1.8M$2.5M
P63

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML