Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIDGEVIEW INSTITUTE MONROE 2026-04-26 08:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIDGEVIEW INSTITUTE MONROE
CCN 114037 | GA | 111 beds | Current EBITDA $1.7M → Pro Forma $3.0M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$901K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$884K
Risk-Adjusted
-$351K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$470K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$465K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$286K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$470K$470K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$452K$13K$465K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$72K$214K$286K$901K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$117K$235K$352K$470K$470K$470K$470K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$116K$232K$349K$465K$465K$465K$465K
A/R Days Reduction$0$95K$190K$286K$286K$286K$286K$286K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$336K$673K$1.0M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x
9.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
10.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
12.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.7M$1.7M7.3%
Year 1$1.8M+$824K$2.6M11.1%
Year 2$1.8M+$1.2M$3.1M13.0%
Year 3$1.9M+$1.2M$3.1M13.3%
Year 4$1.9M+$1.2M$3.2M13.5%
Year 5$2.0M+$1.2M$3.2M13.8%
$17.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$35.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.3M
Value Created
$3.2M
Exit EBITDA
$2.7M
Organic Growth
$12.4M
RCM Value Creation
$3.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$235K$352K$470K$564K
Denial Rate Reductio$232K$349K$465K$558K
A/R Days Reduction$143K$214K$286K$343K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$11K$15K$18K
Total$618K$926K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.3%-11.8%-0.8%6.9%
P76
Net-to-Gross35.3%16.7%24.2%31.6%
P82
Occupancy80.7%61.6%75.0%83.5%
P71
Rev/Bed$212K$541K$1.1M$1.7M
P5
Exp/Bed$196K$591K$1.2M$1.8M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML