Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COASTAL HARBOR TREATMENT CENTER 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COASTAL HARBOR TREATMENT CENTER
CCN 114008 | GA | 74 beds | Current EBITDA $2.5M → Pro Forma $4.1M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$466K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$579K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$573K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$352K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$579K$579K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$557K$16K$573K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$89K$263K$352K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$145K$289K$434K$579K$579K$579K$579K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$143K$287K$430K$573K$573K$573K$573K
A/R Days Reduction$0$117K$235K$352K$352K$352K$352K$352K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$415K$829K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
9.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
10.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
11.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
12.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.5M$2.5M8.8%
Year 1$2.6M+$1.0M$3.6M12.5%
Year 2$2.7M+$1.5M$4.2M14.6%
Year 3$2.8M+$1.5M$4.3M14.8%
Year 4$2.9M+$1.5M$4.4M15.1%
Year 5$2.9M+$1.5M$4.5M15.4%
$25.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$49.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.7M
Value Created
$4.5M
Exit EBITDA
$4.0M
Organic Growth
$15.2M
RCM Value Creation
$4.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$289K$434K$579K$695K
Denial Rate Reductio$287K$430K$573K$688K
A/R Days Reduction$176K$264K$352K$423K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$19K$22K
Total$761K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 71 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.8%-13.3%-1.0%8.4%
P74
Net-to-Gross38.2%18.4%29.2%37.3%
P76
Occupancy68.4%37.5%67.4%80.2%
P54
Rev/Bed$391K$484K$728K$1.6M
P18
Exp/Bed$357K$468K$847K$1.5M
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML