Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUMMITRIDGE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUMMITRIDGE HOSPITAL
CCN 114004 | GA | 96 beds | Current EBITDA $1.6M → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$882K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$907K
Risk-Adjusted
-$303K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$460K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$455K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$280K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$460K$460K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$443K$13K$455K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$71K$209K$280K$882K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$115K$230K$345K$460K$460K$460K$460K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$114K$228K$341K$455K$455K$455K$455K
A/R Days Reduction$0$93K$186K$280K$280K$280K$280K$280K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$329K$659K$981K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x72% / 15.2x
9.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x
10.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x
11.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
12.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.6M$1.6M7.1%
Year 1$1.7M+$806K$2.5M10.9%
Year 2$1.7M+$1.2M$2.9M12.8%
Year 3$1.8M+$1.2M$3.0M13.1%
Year 4$1.8M+$1.2M$3.1M13.3%
Year 5$1.9M+$1.2M$3.1M13.5%
$16.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$34.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.8M
Value Created
$3.1M
Exit EBITDA
$2.6M
Organic Growth
$12.1M
RCM Value Creation
$3.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$230K$345K$460K$552K
Denial Rate Reductio$228K$341K$455K$546K
A/R Days Reduction$140K$210K$280K$336K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$15K$18K
Total$605K$907K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 68 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.1%-12.6%-1.0%8.8%
P70
Net-to-Gross30.8%18.1%26.4%35.3%
P62
Occupancy96.1%50.3%70.1%81.7%
P93
Rev/Bed$239K$489K$909K$1.7M
P9
Exp/Bed$222K$453K$951K$1.7M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML