Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $35.2M (vs $49.6M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $18.8M | $18.8M | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $18.1M | $518K | $18.6M | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $2.9M | $8.6M | $11.5M | $36.1M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $603K | $603K | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 27.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $4.7M | $9.4M | $14.1M | $18.8M | $18.8M | $18.8M | $18.8M |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $4.7M | $9.3M | $14.0M | $18.6M | $18.6M | $18.6M | $18.6M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $3.8M | $7.6M | $11.5M | $11.5M | $11.5M | $11.5M | $11.5M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $301K | $603K | $603K | $603K | $603K | $603K | $603K |
| Cumulative | $0 | $13.5M | $27.0M | $40.2M | $49.6M | $49.6M | $49.6M | $49.6M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $49.6M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 44% / 6.2x | 48% / 7.2x | 52% / 8.2x | 54% / 8.8x | 56% / 9.3x |
| 9.0x | 39% / 5.1x | 43% / 6.0x | 47% / 7.0x | 49% / 7.4x | 51% / 7.9x |
| 10.0x | 34% / 4.3x | 39% / 5.1x | 43% / 6.0x | 45% / 6.4x | 47% / 6.8x |
| 11.0x | 29% / 3.6x | 34% / 4.3x | 39% / 5.1x | 41% / 5.5x | 42% / 5.9x |
| 12.0x | 25% / 3.0x | 30% / 3.7x | 35% / 4.4x | 37% / 4.8x | 39% / 5.1x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline -16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $390.9M | — | $390.9M | 41.5% |
| Year 1 | $402.6M | +$33.0M | $435.6M | 46.3% |
| Year 2 | $414.7M | +$49.6M | $464.2M | 49.3% |
| Year 3 | $427.1M | +$49.6M | $476.7M | 50.6% |
| Year 4 | $439.9M | +$49.6M | $489.5M | 52.0% |
| Year 5 | $453.1M | +$49.6M | $502.7M | 53.4% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $9.4M | $14.1M | $18.8M | $22.6M |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $9.3M | $14.0M | $18.6M | $22.4M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $5.7M | $8.6M | $11.5M | $13.8M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $301K | $452K | $603K | $723K |
| Total | $24.8M | $37.2M | $49.6M | $59.5M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 41.5% | -14.0% | -1.8% | 5.9% | P96 |
| Net-to-Gross | 40.9% | 18.7% | 21.9% | 27.4% | P96 |
| Occupancy | 70.6% | 65.5% | 76.7% | 82.6% | P33 |
| Rev/Bed | $2.9M | $1.1M | $1.6M | $2.1M | P96 |
| Exp/Bed | $1.7M | $1.2M | $1.6M | $2.0M | P54 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.