Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF NEWNAN 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF NEWNAN
CCN 113032 | GA | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $9.8M → Pro Forma $11.6M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$474K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$685K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$678K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$417K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$685K$685K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$659K$19K$678K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$105K$312K$417K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$171K$343K$514K$685K$685K$685K$685K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$170K$339K$509K$678K$678K$678K$678K
A/R Days Reduction$0$139K$278K$417K$417K$417K$417K$417K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$491K$982K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.8M$9.8M28.6%
Year 1$10.1M+$1.2M$11.3M33.0%
Year 2$10.4M+$1.8M$12.2M35.6%
Year 3$10.7M+$1.8M$12.5M36.5%
Year 4$11.0M+$1.8M$12.8M37.5%
Year 5$11.4M+$1.8M$13.2M38.4%
$98.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$144.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$46.8M
Value Created
$13.2M
Exit EBITDA
$15.6M
Organic Growth
$18.0M
RCM Value Creation
$13.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$343K$514K$685K$822K
Denial Rate Reductio$339K$509K$678K$814K
A/R Days Reduction$208K$313K$417K$500K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$901K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.6%-15.0%-1.4%7.2%
P92
Net-to-Gross76.7%18.6%30.4%38.1%
P98
Occupancy87.4%30.5%60.4%79.5%
P88
Rev/Bed$571K$479K$680K$1.4M
P43
Exp/Bed$408K$480K$769K$1.5M
P16

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML