Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AHN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AHN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 113029 | GA | 58 beds | Current EBITDA $47K → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$47K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$881K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$877K
Risk-Adjusted
-$331K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$459K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$455K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$279K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$459K$459K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$442K$13K$455K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$70K$209K$279K$881K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$115K$230K$344K$459K$459K$459K$459K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$114K$227K$341K$455K$455K$455K$455K
A/R Days Reduction$0$93K$186K$279K$279K$279K$279K$279K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$329K$658K$980K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x186% / 192.2x192% / 213.9x198% / 235.6x201% / 246.5x203% / 257.3x
9.0x179% / 170.5x186% / 189.8x191% / 209.1x194% / 218.7x196% / 228.4x
10.0x174% / 153.1x179% / 170.5x185% / 187.8x188% / 196.5x190% / 205.2x
11.0x168% / 138.9x174% / 154.7x179% / 170.5x182% / 178.4x184% / 186.3x
12.0x164% / 127.0x169% / 141.5x175% / 156.0x177% / 163.2x179% / 170.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.2x
Headroom (turns)
95%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 95% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.3x, adding 8.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$47K$47K0.2%
Year 1$49K+$805K$854K3.7%
Year 2$50K+$1.2M$1.3M5.5%
Year 3$52K+$1.2M$1.3M5.5%
Year 4$53K+$1.2M$1.3M5.5%
Year 5$55K+$1.2M$1.3M5.5%
$473K
Entry EV (10x)
$13.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.4M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$75K
Organic Growth
$12.1M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$230K$344K$459K$551K
Denial Rate Reductio$227K$341K$455K$546K
A/R Days Reduction$140K$210K$279K$335K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$15K$18K
Total$604K$906K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.2%-15.0%-1.4%7.2%
P55
Net-to-Gross40.9%18.6%30.4%38.1%
P82
Occupancy79.9%28.7%55.1%78.8%
P78
Rev/Bed$396K$479K$680K$1.4M
P18
Exp/Bed$395K$480K$769K$1.5M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML