Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LANDMARK HOSPITAL OF SAVANNAH 2026-04-26 09:52 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LANDMARK HOSPITAL OF SAVANNAH
CCN 112018 | GA | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $-200K → Pro Forma $701K (+$901K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-200K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$901K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$701K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$657K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$901K
Modeled Uplift
$608K
Risk-Adjusted
-$294K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$343K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$339K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$208K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$901K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$343K$343K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$330K$9K$339K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$53K$156K$208K$657K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$86K$171K$257K$343K$343K$343K$343K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$85K$170K$254K$339K$339K$339K$339K
A/R Days Reduction$0$69K$139K$208K$208K$208K$208K$208K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$245K$491K$731K$901K$901K$901K$901K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $901K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.9x
Headroom (turns)
137%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 137% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.4x, adding 101.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-200K$-200K-1.2%
Year 1$-206K+$601K$395K2.3%
Year 2$-212K+$901K$689K4.0%
Year 3$-218K+$901K$683K4.0%
Year 4$-225K+$901K$676K3.9%
Year 5$-232K+$901K$670K3.9%
$-2.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$7.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.4M
Value Created
$670K
Exit EBITDA
$-318K
Organic Growth
$9.0M
RCM Value Creation
$670K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$171K$257K$343K$411K
Denial Rate Reductio$170K$254K$339K$407K
A/R Days Reduction$104K$156K$208K$250K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$451K$676K$901K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.2%-16.5%-3.4%5.7%
P53
Net-to-Gross40.3%23.1%32.3%40.9%
P72
Occupancy52.9%27.6%45.1%68.4%
P57
Rev/Bed$343K$516K$742K$1.4M
P7
Exp/Bed$347K$579K$837K$1.5M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML