Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COLUMBUS SPECIATLY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COLUMBUS SPECIATLY HOSPITAL
CCN 112012 | GA | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-783K → Pro Forma $-342K (+$441K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-783K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$441K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-342K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+536bps
Margin Improvement
$316K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$441K
Modeled Uplift
$300K
Risk-Adjusted
-$141K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$167K
+203bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$165K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$100K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+12bp
Total EBITDA Impact$441K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$159K$8K$167K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$165K$165K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$25K$75K$100K$316K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$42K$83K$125K$167K$167K$167K$167K
Cost to Collect$0$41K$82K$124K$165K$165K$165K$165K
A/R Days Reduction$0$33K$67K$100K$100K$100K$100K$100K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$121K$242K$358K$441K$441K$441K$441K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $441K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-783K$-783K-9.5%
Year 1$-807K+$294K$-512K-6.2%
Year 2$-831K+$441K$-389K-4.7%
Year 3$-856K+$441K$-414K-5.0%
Year 4$-881K+$441K$-440K-5.3%
Year 5$-908K+$441K$-467K-5.7%
$-7.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-5.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.7M
Value Created
$-467K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.2M
Organic Growth
$4.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-467K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$83K$125K$167K$200K
Cost to Collect$82K$124K$165K$198K
A/R Days Reduction$50K$75K$100K$120K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$221K$331K$441K$530K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.5%-19.5%-5.0%4.5%
P43
Net-to-Gross47.4%28.7%35.9%50.4%
P69
Occupancy59.6%22.9%40.5%55.1%
P76
Rev/Bed$343K$516K$817K$1.3M
P4
Exp/Bed$376K$632K$865K$1.3M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML