Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EMORY LONG TERM ACUTE CARE 2026-04-26 12:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EMORY LONG TERM ACUTE CARE
CCN 112006 | GA | 56 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.1M → Pro Forma $-4.6M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$996K
Risk-Adjusted
-$417K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$537K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$532K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$327K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$537K$537K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$517K$15K$532K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$82K$244K$327K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$134K$269K$403K$537K$537K$537K$537K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$133K$266K$399K$532K$532K$532K$532K
A/R Days Reduction$0$109K$218K$327K$327K$327K$327K$327K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$385K$769K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.1M$-6.1M-22.6%
Year 1$-6.2M+$942K$-5.3M-19.7%
Year 2$-6.4M+$1.4M$-5.0M-18.7%
Year 3$-6.6M+$1.4M$-5.2M-19.4%
Year 4$-6.8M+$1.4M$-5.4M-20.1%
Year 5$-7.0M+$1.4M$-5.6M-20.9%
$-60.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-61.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.1M
Value Created
$-5.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-9.6M
Organic Growth
$14.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$269K$403K$537K$644K
Denial Rate Reductio$266K$399K$532K$638K
A/R Days Reduction$163K$245K$327K$392K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$21K
Total$706K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 67 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.6%-15.8%-1.6%6.7%
P17
Net-to-Gross26.6%18.8%30.6%38.0%
P42
Occupancy69.8%27.5%53.7%77.3%
P64
Rev/Bed$479K$479K$648K$1.4M
P25
Exp/Bed$588K$488K$764K$1.5M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML